Dual anti-viral treatment for persistent COVID-19 in immunocompromised hemato-oncological patients is associated with a favorable prognosis and minor side effects.

In hemato-oncological patients, COVID-19 can present as a persistent infection with ongoing symptoms and viral replication over a prolonged period of time. Data are scarce on the preferred treatment options for these patients. We describe our experience with a five-day course of dual anti-viral treatment with remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for hemato-oncological immunocompromised patients with persistent COVID-19. Fifteen patients with a history of lymphoma, CLL, and MM were included. Eight were male, median age was 74. All patients had an immediate clinical and virological response. In 73 % of patients, PCR for SARS-CoV-2 became negative at the end of treatment and the rest had an increase in PCR cycle threshold (CT) values, with a median increase of 6 cycles. After a follow-up of three months, 60 % of patients remained in full clinical and virological remission. None required invasive mechanical ventilation or died. The side effects we observed, neutropenia, lactatemia and elevated transaminases, were mild and almost all transient in nature. We conclude that dual anti-viral treatment appears to be a valid treatment option for persistent COVID-19.

Comparative analysis of CRP as a biomarker of the inflammatory response intensity among common viral infections affecting the lungs: COVID-19 versus influenza A, influenza B and respiratory syncytial virus.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a useful inflammatory biomarker for patients admitted with an infection. This study aimed to compare CRP level as an indicator of inflammation severity between SARS-CoV-2 and common respiratory viral infections. A cross-sectional study of all adult patients hospitalized in the internal medicine department, geriatric department, or internal intensive care unit between 02/2012 and 06/2021 with laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection was performed. SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were studied. Patients with laboratory-confirmed concurrent viral or bacterial infections were excluded. Patients with malignancy were also excluded. Age, gender, comorbidities, and CRP level upon admission were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariable analyses were applied. Among 1124 patients, 18.2% had SARS­CoV­2, 48.3% influenza A, 18.9% RSV, and 14.6% influenza B. SARS­CoV­2 patients were significantly younger (median 69.4 vs. ≥ 76 years) and had lower Charlson score (median 3 vs. ≥ 4 in other groups) compared to patients with other viral pathogens. After adjustment for patients' age, gender and comorbidities, SARS­CoV­2 patients had a higher probability (OR = 1.84-2.02, p < 0.01) of having CRP values in the upper quartile (> 117 mg/L) compared to all other viral pathogens while between all others there was no significant difference. To conclude, a higher CRP level upon admission is approximately twice more common among SARS-CoV-2 patients compared to other widespread respiratory viruses which may demonstrate the higher intensity of inflammation caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Normoferremia in Patients with Acute Bacterial Infections-A Hitherto Unexplored Field of the Dichotomy between CRP and Ferritin Expression in Patients with Hyper Inflammation and Failure to Increase Ferritin.

Ferritin is an acute phase response protein, which may not rise as expected in acute bacterial infections. This could be due to the time required for its production or to a lack of response of ferritin to the bacterial inflammatory process. Medical records of hospitalized patients with acute hyper inflammation were retrieved and studied, looking closely at two acute phase proteins: C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin. The estimated time between symptom onset and the procurement of blood tests was also measured. 225 patients had a median ferritin level of 109.9 ng/mL [IQR 85.1, 131.7] and a median CRP level of 248.4 mg/L [IQR 221, 277.5]. An infectious inflammatory process was identified in 195 patients. Ferritin levels were relatively low in comparison with the CRP in each group, divided according to time from symptom onset until the procurement of blood tests. The discrepancy between high CRP and low ferritin suggests that these two acute phase response proteins utilize different pathways, resulting in a failure to increase ferritin concentrations in a documented state of hyperinflammation. A new entity of normoferremic inflammation accounts for a significant percentage of patients with acute bacterial infections, which enables bacteria to better survive the inflammation and serves as a new "inflammatory stamp".

Early signaling of bacteremia in patients who present to the department of emergency medicine with relatively low C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations.

OBJECTIVES: Examiningthe usefulness of C-reactive protein velocity (CRPv) as an early biomarker for the presence of bacteraemia in patients presenting to the Department of Emergency Medicine with acute infection/inflammation and suspected bacteraemia. METHODS: A retrospective study examining a cohort of patients who presented to the E.R and in whom blood cultures were taken. CRPv was calculated as the difference in mg/hour/litter between two consecutive CRP tests performed within 12 h. RESULTS: 256 patients were included in the cohort. Using CRPv in patients who at first presented with a relatively low (17.9 ≤ mg/L 1stquartile) CRP concentration, we found an AUC of 0.808 ± 0.038 (p < 0.001) for the presence of positive versus negative blood cultures (what is AUC?). This was better than the AUC that was obtained when the WBC for the same purpose. CONCLUSIONS: CRPv may be a useful biomarker in the identification of patients with suspected bacteremiaand a low CRP-a challenging situation for clinicians who may underestimate the severity of illness in this patient group.

Differentiating between bacterial and viral infections by estimated CRP velocity.

PURPOSE: Differentiating between acute viral and bacterial infection is challenging due to the similarity in symptom presentation. Blood tests can assist in the diagnosis, but they reflect the immediate status and fail to consider the dynamics of an inflammatory response with time since symptom onset. We applied estimated C-reactive protein (CRP) velocity (eCRPv), as derived from the admission CRP level divided by time from symptom onset, in order to better distinguish between viral and bacterial infections. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients admitted to the emergency department with a confirmed viral (n = 83) or bacterial (n = 181) infection. eCRPv was defined as the ratio between the absolute CRP level upon admission to time from symptom onset (in hours). Absolute CRP and eCRPv values were compared between the 3 groups. RESULTS: Bacterial patients presented with higher CRP levels (133 mg/L) upon admission compared to viral patients (23.31 mg/L) (P < 0.001). Their median value of eCRPv velocity was 4 times higher compared to the viral patients (1.1 mg/L/h compared 0.25 mg/L/h, P < 0.001). Moreover, in intermediate values of CRP (100-150 mg/L) upon admission, in which the differential diagnosis is controversial, high eCRPv is indicative of bacterial infection, eCRPv >4 mg/L/h represents only bacterial patients. CONCLUSIONS: During an acute febrile illness, the eCRPv value can be used for rapid differentiation between bacterial and viral infection, especially in patients with high CRP values. This capability can potentially expedite the provision of appropriate therapeutic management. Further research and validation may open new applications of the kinetics of inflammation for rapid diagnosis of an infectious vs. a viral source of fever.

C-Reactive Protein Velocity (CRPv) as a New Biomarker for the Early Detection of Acute Infection/Inflammation.

C-reactive protein (CRP) is considered a biomarker of infection/inflammation. It is a commonly used tool for early detection of infection in the emergency room or as a point-of-care test and especially for differentiating between bacterial and viral infections, affecting decisions of admission and initiation of antibiotic treatments. As C-reactive protein is part of a dynamic and continuous inflammatory process, a single CRP measurement, especially at low concentrations, may erroneously lead to a wrong classification of an infection as viral over bacterial and delay appropriate antibiotic treatment. In the present review, we introduce the concept of C-reactive protein dynamics, measuring the velocity of C-reactive protein elevation, as a tool to increase this biomarker's diagnostic ability. We review the studies that helped define new metrics such as estimated C-reactive protein velocity (velocity of C-reactive protein elevation from symptoms' onset to first C-reactive protein measurement) and the measured C-reactive protein velocity (velocity between sequential C-reactive protein measurements) and the use of these metrics in different clinical scenarios. We also discuss future research directions for this novel metric.

Sepsis Related Mortality Associated with an Inflammatory Burst in Patients Admitting to the Department of Internal Medicine with Apparently Normal C-Reactive Protein Concentration.

Background: Patients who are admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine with apparently normal C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration impose a special challenge due the assumption that they might not harbor a severe and potentially lethal medical condition. Methods: A retrospective cohort of all patients who were admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine with a CRP concentration of ≤31.9 mg/L and had a second CRP test obtained within the next 24 h. Seven day mortality data were analyzed. Results: Overall, 3504 patients were analyzed with a mean first and second CRP of 8.8 (8.5) and 14.6 (21.6) mg/L, respectively. The seven day mortality increased from 1.8% in the first quartile of the first CRP to 7.5% in the fourth quartile of the first CRP (p < 0.0001) and from 0.6% in the first quartile of the second CRP to 9.5% in the fourth quartile of the second CRP test (p < 0.0001), suggesting a clear relation between the admission CRP and in hospital seven day mortality. Conclusions: An association exists between the quartiles of CRP and 7-day mortality as well as sepsis related cause of death. Furthermore, the CRP values 24 h after hospital admission improved the discrimination.

Age-Dependent Biomarkers for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Patients.

Background: Several biomarkers and models have been proposed to predict in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients. However, these studies have not examined the association in sub-populations. The present study aimed to identify the association between the two most common inflammatory biomarkers in the emergency department and in-hospital mortality in subgroups of patients. Methods: A historical cohort study of adult patients who were admitted to acute-care hospital between March and December 2020 and had a diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Data on age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, white blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and in-hospital mortality were collected. Discrimination ability of each biomarker was observed and the CHAID method was used to identify the association in subgroups of patients. Results: Overall, 762 patients (median age 70.9 years, 59.7% males) were included in the study. Of them, 25.1% died during hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was associated with higher CRP (median 138 mg/L vs. 85 mg/L, p < 0.001), higher WBC count (median 8.5 vs. 6.6 K/µL, p < 0.001), and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (median 9.2 vs. 5.4, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was similar among all biomarkers (WBC 0.643, NLR 0.677, CRP 0.646, p > 0.1 for all comparisons). The CHAID method revealed that WBC count was associated with in-hospital mortality in patients aged 43.1−66.0 years (<11 K/µL: 10.1% vs. 11+ K/µL: 27.9%), NLR in patients aged 66.1−80 years (≤8: 15.7%, >8: 43.3%), and CRP in patients aged 80.1+ years (≤47 mg/L: 18.8%, 47.1−149 mg/L: 43.1%, and 149.1+: 71.7% mortality). Conclusions: WBC, NLR, and CRP present similar discrimination abilities. However, each biomarker should be considered as a predictor for in-hospital mortality in different age groups.

Immunogenicity and Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Among Actively Treated Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Activity and safety of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in actively treated patients with solid tumors is currently unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 326 patients with solid tumors treated with anticancer medications to determine the proportion of cancer patients with immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 following 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. The control group comprised 164 vaccinated healthy adults. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoglobulin G antibodies were measured using a level greater than 50 AU/mL as a cutoff for seropositivity. Information on adverse effects was collected using a questionnaire. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: Most patients (205, 62.9%) were treated with chemotherapy either alone or with additional therapy; 55 (16.9%) were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and 38 (11.7%) with targeted therapy alone; 28 (8.6%) received other combinations. The vaccine was well tolerated, and no severe side effects were reported. Among patients with cancer, 39 (11.9%) were seronegative compared with 5 (3.0%) of the control group (P = .001). Median immunoglobulin G titers were statistically significantly lower among patients with cancer compared with control (931 AU/mL vs 2817 AU/mL, P = .003). Seronegativity proportions were higher in the chemotherapy-treated group (n = 19; 18.8%) compared with the immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients (n = 5; 9.1%) and with those treated with targeted therapy (n = 1; 2.6%) (P = .02). Titers were also statistically significantly different among treatment types (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The BNT162b2 vaccine is safe and effective in actively treated patients with cancer. The relatively lower antibody titers and lower proportion of seropositive patients, especially among chemotherapy-treated patients, call for continuing the use of personal protective measures in these patients, even following vaccination.

C-reactive protein velocity discriminates between acute viral and bacterial infections in patients who present with relatively low CRP concentrations.

BACKGROUND: To assess the utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) velocity to discriminate between patients with acute viral and bacterial infections who presented with relatively low CRP concentrations and were suspected of having a bacterial infection. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with acute infections who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a relatively low first CRP measurement (CRP1) ≤ 31.9 mg/L and received antibiotics shortly after. We then calculated C-reactive protein velocity (CRPv), milligram per liter per hour, for each patient based on CRP1 and the second CRP value (CRP2) measured within the first 24 h since admission. Finally, we compared CRPv between patients with bacterial and viral infections. RESULTS: We have presently analyzed 74 patients with acute bacterial infections and 62 patients with acute viral infections at the mean age of 80 and 66 years respectively, 68 male and 68 female. CRP1 did not differ between both groups of patients (16.2 ± 8.6 and 14.8 ± 8.5 for patients with viral and bacterial infections respectively, p value = 0.336). However, the CRP2 was significantly different between the groups (30.2 ± 21.9 and 75.6 ± 51.3 for patients with viral and bacterial infections respectively, p-value < 0.001) and especially the CRPv was much higher in patients with acute bacterial infections compared to patients with acute viral infections (0.9 ± 1.2 and 4.4 ± 2.7 respectively, p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CRPv and CRP2 are useful biomarkers that can discriminate significantly between patients who present with acute bacterial and viral infections, and relatively low CRP concentration upon admission who were suspected of having a bacterial infection.

Water avoidance and modification of exit-site care with stoma bag results in reduced exit-site infection rate in peritoneal dialysis patients.

AIM: Infection is one of the drawbacks associated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is related to significant morbidity. After we experienced an increase in exit-site infection (ESI) rate, mostly derived from environmental and water-derived organisms, we hypothesized that preventing exit-site exposure to water and narrowing local antibiotics range will reduce colonization and subsequent infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we aimed to estimate PD-related infections after exit-site policy change in a prospective study cohort of 27 participants compared to a control group of 58 participants. The modification of exit-site care consisted of applying a stoma bag during daily shower to prevent water exposure and conversion of local antibiotic from gentamycin to mupirocin. Primary outcome was catheter-related infection. Secondary outcomes were peritonitis rate and infection-related outcomes. RESULTS: The study group had a significantly lower ESI and ESI from environmental organisms' free probability. Rate of ESI from all causes was 0.054 ± 0.09 vs. 0.031 ± 0.09 episodes per patients' month for the control and study group, respectively (p = 0.049). Rate of environmental organism-related ESI was 0.047 ± 0.07 vs. 0.015 ± 0.08 episodes per patients' months for control and study group, respectively (p = 0.042). A higher risk of ESI from all organisms, and specifically from environmental organisms, was associated with being in the control group and a longer follow-up period. Rate of peritonitis was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The adjusted exit-site care policy significantly lowered ESI incidence. Avoidance of water exposure may have contributed to lessen bacterial colonization.

The superiority of 72 h leukocyte descent over CRP for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Detection of an eventful course in the early days of sepsis treatment is clinically relevant. The white blood cell count (WBCC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are used in daily practice to monitor the intensity of the inflammatory response associated with sepsis. It is not entirely clear which of the two might better discriminate the outcomes of patients with sepsis. METHODS: 30-day mortality was assessed in a cohort of patients who were hospitalized with sepsis in the departments of Internal Medicine in a tertiary medical center. Admission and 72-hour time points were analyzed to discriminate between patients with increased versus decreased 30 days mortality risk. RESULTS: The study included 195 patients. Higher 72 h CRP, WBCC, neutrophil counts and neutrophils to lymphocyte ratio were associated with increased mortality (p < 0.02). Baseline WBCC and CRP failed to discriminate between patients who died and those who survived (AUC = 0.551, 0.479). In multivariate analysis of the 72 h tests, higher WBCC count (OR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.05-1.20, p = 0.001), was associated with increased mortality whereas CRP was not (OR = 1.004, 95%CI 0.998-1.01, p = 0.146). CONCLUSION: Patients who presented a 72-hour leukocyte descent had a better outcome and in this regard, WBCC was superior to 72-hour CRP in predicting 30 days mortality.

A second C-reactive protein (CRP) test to detect inflammatory burst in patients with acute bacterial infections presenting with a first relatively low CRP.

A first C-reactive protein (CRP) test, as often performed by clinicians during the presentation of patients with an acute bacterial infection, might be misleading. The aim of our study was to explore the dynamic between a second CRP test taken within 12 hours from admission CRP test in a cohort of patients diagnosed with acute bacterial infection in comparison to CRP in a control group of apparently healthy individuals.This was a historical cohort study comprised of all patients admitted to the Sourasky Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Israel, between July 2007 and March 2016. The study cohort included adult patients who were diagnosed as having an infection, assumed to be of bacterial etiology (cellulitis and erysipelas, pneumonia, cholecystitis, pyelonephritis, or septicemia), who had a CRP test during the first 6 hours of hospital admission (baseline CRP), and a successive CRP test up to 12 hours from the first one (recurrent CRP). The control group was of healthy subjects who attended our medical center for a routine annual check-up.The study included 950 patients. Baseline CRP ranged from 0.04 to 454 mg/L. The median CRP velocity was 0.53 mg/L/h. Patients were grouped by baseline CRP into 4 groups (CRP < 10, 10-74.9, 75-199.9, ≥200). There was an increase in median CRP velocity between the first (0.48 mg/L/h) and the second (0.93 mg/L/h) groups, which then was decreased in the next 2 groups (0.46 and -2.58 mg/L/h, respectively). In 45 of 103 (44%) patients of the group of baseline CRP concentration less than 10 mg/dL with bacterial diagnosis, there was a complete overlap with CRP values of apparently healthy individuals during their routine annual checkup.A first single low CRP result cannot exclude the presence of a significant bacterial infection. Patients with acute bacterial infection might present with a relatively low CRP value that at times correspond to normal limit CRP concentrations. A second test, obtained within 12 hours of admission, might serve as an important tool to identify patient with an evolving inflammatory burst commonly seen during acute bacterial infection.

The potential benefit of a second C-reactive protein measurement in patients with gram-negative bacteraemia presenting to the emergency medicine department.

BACKGROUND: Low C-reactive protein in acute bacterial infections could convey the erroneous impression of a mild infection. We focussed on gram-negative bacteraemia, a phenomenon frequently seen at the emergency room. METHODS: Of 2200 patients with gram-negative bacteraemia, 460 patients with first C-reactive protein <30 mg/L and 460 patients with C-reactive protein >187 mg/L were reviewed. Following exclusions, we finally investigated 229 and 289 patients with low and high C-reactive protein concentrations, respectively. RESULTS: The cohort was divided into low and high C-reactive protein groups. Median first C-reactive protein was 13.6 and 219.9 mg/L, respectively (interquartile range 6.4-21.6 and 195-270.1). Compared to patients with first high C-reactive protein, patients with first low C-reactive protein concentrations had a significant five-fold higher C-reactive protein level with their second test. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with gram-negative bacteraemia can present with C-reactive protein within the range of apparently healthy individuals. A second C-reactive protein might help to avoid an erroneous decision regarding the severity of the infection.

The association between C-reactive protein and common blood tests in apparently healthy individuals undergoing a routine health examination.

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is considered a marker of inflammation. We sought to evaluate the association between CRP level and commonly use blood tests in apparently healthy population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of all visits in a routine health examination center between 1/2002 and 7/2018. CRP, complete blood count and chemistry blood panel were evaluated in each visit. Visits of individuals who had CRP above the 99th percentile or use statins were excluded. Correlation between CRP and blood tests was evaluated in the whole cohort as well as in sub-populations. RESULTS: Blood parameters of 33,261 visits were included. Moderate positive correlation between CRP and white blood cells count (r = 0.269), neutrophils count (r = 0.275), triglycerides (r = 0.275), alkaline phosphatase (r = 0.221) and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (r = 0.220) was evaluated. Correlation with triglycerides was stronger in female then in males (r = 0.38 vs. 0.25). Uric acid was positively correlated in females and males. In participants under 30 years, inverse correlation with hemoglobin, creatinine and albumin levels and positive correlation with cholesterol were documented. CONCLUSION: Significant moderate association between CRP and several blood tests was evaluated in apparently healthy population. This information should be used for further studies of the relationship between inflammation and biological processes.

Using the kinetics of C-reactive protein response to improve the differential diagnosis between acute bacterial and viral infections.

PURPOSE: Differential diagnosis between acute viral and bacterial infection is an emerging common challenge for a physician in the emergency department. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is used to support diagnosis of bacterial infection, but in patients admitted with low CRP, its ability to discriminate between viral and bacterial infections is limited. We aimed to use two consecutive CRP measurements in order to improve differential diagnosis between bacterial and viral infection. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort (n = 1629) study of adult patients admitted to the emergency department with a subsequent microbiological confirmation of either viral or bacterial infection. Trend of CRP was defined as the absolute difference between the first two measurements of CRP divided by the time between them, and we investigated the ability of this parameter to differentiate between viral and bacterial infection. RESULTS: In patients with relatively low initial CRP concentration (< 60 mg/L, n = 634 patients), where the uncertainty regarding the type of infection is the highest, the trend improved diagnosis accuracy (AUC 0.83 compared to 0.57 for the first CRP measurement). Trend values above 3.47 mg/L/h discriminated bacterial from viral infection with 93.8% specificity and 50% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approach for using the kinetics of CRP in patients whose first CRP measurement is low can assist in differential diagnosis between acute bacterial and viral infection.

Exercise capacity and body mass index - important predictors of change in resting heart rate.

BACKGROUND: Resting heart rate (RHR) is an obtainable, inexpensive, non-invasive test, readily available on any medical document. RHR has been established as a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity, is related to other cardiovascular risk factors, and may possibly predict them. Change in RHR over time (∆RHR) has been found to be a potential predictor of mortality. METHODS: In this prospective study, RHR and ∆RHR were evaluated at baseline and over a period of 2.9 years during routine check-ups in 6683 subjects without known cardiovascular disease from the TAMCIS: Tel-Aviv Medical Center Inflammation Survey. Multiple linear regression analysis with three models was used to examine ∆RHR. The first model accounted for possible confounders by adjusting for age, sex and body mass index (BMI). The 2nd model included smoking status, baseline RHR, diastolic blood pressure (BP), dyslipidemia, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and metabolic equivalents of task (MET), and in the last model the change in MET and change in BMI were added. RESULTS: RHR decreased with age, even after adjustment for sex, BMI and MET. The mean change in RHR was - 1.1 beats/min between two consecutive visits, in both men and women. This ∆RHR was strongly correlated with baseline RHR, age, initial MET, and change occurring in MET and BMI (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the need for examining individual patients' ∆RHR. Reinforcing that a positive ∆RHR is an indicator of poor adherence to a healthy lifestyle.

Chronic schistosomiasis in African immigrants in Israel: Lessons for the non-endemic setting.

To study the clinical presentation of Chronic Schistosomiasis (CS) in immigrants from East Africa to Israel and the tests that were useful in confirming the diagnosis.A retrospective study of all medical notes pertaining to hospitalized patients who were immigrants from East Africa with a pathological or microscopic confirmation of CS. Literature review was also conducted focusing on diagnosis of schistosomiasis among immigrants from endemic countries.We identified 32 suspected and 11 confirmed cases of CS. Most of the patients (82%) presented with gastrointestinal symptoms. Sensitivity of stool smear, serology and tissue diagnosis (by histopathology or microscopy) were 14%, 100%, 89%, respectively. Patients have undergone extensive diagnostic evaluation with long hospitalization stays (median 10 days, range 4 to 33 days).CS has multiple presentations and is seen in Israel among refugees from Eritrea and Sudan. Most of the manifestations are gastrointestinal, suggestive of infection with Schistosoma mansoni (S. mansoni). Standard diagnostic techniques used in endemic countries, such as microscopy for ova and parasites were unhelpful, necessitating more advanced procedures like colonoscopic or liver biopsy. We propose a diagnostic algorithm for CS in this patient population in order to make an accurate diagnosis and avoid unnecessary invasive procedures.

Anemia measurements to distinguish between viral and bacterial infections in the emergency department.

The clinical diagnosis of acute infections in the emergency department is a challenging task due to the similarity in symptom presentation between virally and bacterially infected individuals, while the use of routine laboratory tests for pathogen identification is often time-consuming and may contain contaminants. We investigated the ability of various anemia-related parameters, including hemoglobin, red cell distribution width (RDW), and iron, to differentiate between viral and bacterial infection in a retrospective study of 3883 patients admitted to the emergency department with a confirmed viral (n = 1238) or bacterial (n = 2645) infection based on either laboratory tests or microbiological cultures. The ratio between hemoglobin to RDW was found to be significant in distinguishing between virally and bacterially infected patients and outperformed other anemia measurements. Moreover, the predictive value of the ratio was high even in patients presenting with low C-reactive protein values (< 21 mg/L). We followed the dynamics of hemoglobin, RDW, and the ratio between them up to 72 h post emergency department admission, and observed a consistent discrepancy between virally and bacterially infected patients over time. Additional analysis demonstrated higher levels of ferritin and lower levels of iron in bacterially infected compared with virally infected patients. The anemia measurements were associated with length of hospital stay, where all higher levels, except for RDW, corresponded to a shorter hospitalization period. We highlighted the importance of various anemia measurements as an additional host-biomarker to discern virally from bacterially infected patients.

Characteristics of apparently healthy individuals with a very low C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: The importance of the inflammatory processes and C-reactive protein (CRP) evaluation was observed. Only few studies used cut-off value <1 mg/L. We sought to evaluate the association between very low CRP (vlCRP) and health status, to describe the repetition of vlCRP and to identify predictors for repetition. METHODS: A historical cohort study of all participants who underwent a routine annual check-up between January 2002 and July 2018 at the Tel Aviv Sourasky medical center. CRP test was evaluated in all participants. Individuals who use statins or with CRP >10 mg/L were excluded. CRP ≤0.12 mg/L was considered as vlCRP. RESULTS: The final study cohort included 14,161 individuals. Of them, 5065 were females and mean age was 43.4 years (SD 10.6). vlCRP at first check-up was observed in 1299 (9.2%) of the participants. In multivariable analysis, older age, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and smoking were significantly associated with lower probability of vlCRP. At the second check-up, 50.1% vlCRP repetition was observed with no significant predictor from previous visit. CONCLUSION: vlCRP is associated with younger age, non-smoking, and absence of hyperlipidemia and of hypertension. However, it may also be part of the individual physiology.